10,975 signatures
Collection finished
Petition is addressed to: European Commission
EU authorities should recognize that seed savers are important for the conservation of varieties and exempt them from plant health registration.
Some seed savers in Europe have already given up saving seeds. They can no longer continue to make seeds or other plant reproductive material available in a legal manner, and they do not want to do it illegally.
However, the conservation of cultivated plant diversity in most European countries depends on such individual seed savers.
With its Plant Health Regulation, the EU intends to control the spread of plant pests by enabling Plant Health Offices to search everywhere for viruses, bacteria, fungi or insects, even in gardens and on the premises of seed savers who share rare plant propagation material with interested people via web shops. The EU put in force an elaborate control system a few years ago. They are are currently re-evaluating their provisions regarding web shops. This is the opportunity for seed savers to ring alarm bells.
General control of those who are hobby gardeners is not the intention of this regulation. However, persons who are conserving cultivated plant biodiversity and are using web shops to reach out to like-minded people, now have to register. This is likely to affect the majority of seed savers in most EU countries. Registered persons and organisations have to fulfill certain obligations such as: knowing EU regulations, ensuring traceability, and allowing for eradication of plants found to carry pests. They can also pay an authorized operator to do it for them. For some plants particularly susceptible to certain pests, among them tomatoes and beans, plant passports have to be issued for each web shop sale.
Due to the tiny size of the lots, extra administration costs would increase the price of diversity seeds, considerably more than for mass commercial seed varieties. A cost recovery scheme would not help, because even this means extra administration. Also, any “lighter regulation” as proposed by some would not help, as it would still require the registration of people engaged in the conservation of diversity. Seed savers have neither the time nor the money for extra administration. They already have plants and possible pests under close scrutiny, since they don’t want to lose any plant from which they have chosen to harvest seed. Only operators with paid staff have so far been able to cope with just some of the legal requirements.
However, it would cut cultivated plant diversity from its roots, if throughout Europe it was conserved by only a handful of organisations with paid staff. The local engagement of many people in cultivating plant diversity must remain movement in society. It requires many gardens and many people to love, care for and develop the living cultural heritage adapted to local conditions and then hand it over to the next generation. Who would get engaged if expensive seed and official registration were needed from the start?
Reason
The seed saving community prevents rather than eradicates pests. They care for healthy soils, with mixed cultivation, crop rotation, an environment that strengthens naturally occurring beneficial predators and therefore also increases the vitality and adaptability of the plants. With their broad genetic base, diverse varieties are able to withstand stress. A good example is the German apple variety "Edelborsdorfer" which for 600 years has been free of any damage from scab, the most important disease in European commercial apple cultivation.
The fact that old varieties lack modern “resistance genes”, is hardly a disadvantage. Such resistance genes are single genes that can be broken by pests or diseases adapting to them. Monocultures encourage pests to multiply and sometimes develop and spread new variants. Even diversity varieties can be affected.
Diversity varieties, however are often not affected by the presence of a virus or other pest. To eradicate these healthy plants would be a serious mistake if the EU Regulation truly aims at better plant health.
Some of the seed savers have not only cancelled their web shops, but also ceased their activity. Without web shops, the sale of tomato and bean seed in particular, dubbed as „diversity diplomats“ due to their importance and attractiveness, the cultivation of numerous varieties and many other species would be reduced to a fraction of what is grown today in gardens and fields. More damage to diversity is likely if seed savers are not immediately and completely exempted from the official registration obligation under Plant Health Regulation EU 2016/2031.
Diversity varieties are a necessity, not a risk, as some are claiming. Imposing the registration obligation on seed savers using web shops could deeply damage diversity conservation and does little to help to avoid plant health problems in the EU.
See also: https://www.openpetition.eu/petition/online/free-seed-exchange-for-savers-of-seed-diversity
Petition details
Petition started:
09/26/2021
Petition ends:
09/26/2022
Region:
European Union
Topic:
Civil rights
News
-
Message about a submitted petition
on 01 Jan 2024Dear signatories,
As if the deregulation of genetic engineering and the legal reform of seed marketing were not enough of a threat to crop diversity, plant health legislation is also currently being amended.
We start with information on the status of the registration obligation for seed savers. At the end of this message you will find two links to petitions against the proposals for reform of seed marketing legislation and the deregulation of new genetic engineering.
In 2021-2022, you thankfully signed the petition against the registration obligation for professionally engaged seed savers to plant protection authorities. Recently, the EU Commission presented an amendment proposal. It still does not include an exemption for the conservation of diversity!
In the proposed amendment, the problem would remain unchanged: Professionally committed seed savers must register officially and fulfil a number of administrative tasks if they sell seeds and seedlings of rare varieties of tomatoes, beans and some other vegetables or scions of rare fruit and nut varieties to hobby gardeners, and if they wish to use a web shop for this purpose.
They can also commission an authorised company to do this: provide a risk prevention plan, issue plant passports, ensure traceability, draw up reports, support inspections and, if an infection is found, even destroy rare varieties.
For the small batches of rare varieties and species, the costs of maintaining diversity would increase considerably more than for seeds produced in large quantities for commercial agriculture.
Many of those affected could give up their already labour-intensive conservation work due to the additional administrative work or not even start their careers. Due to the regulations on traceability and eradication, rare and diverse varieties could simply be destroyed.
However, the risk of so-called quarantine pests spreading in our gardens is low. We do not have monocultures, do not operate large fields or greenhouses for propagation and hybridisation, not even in other climate zones of our planet, and do not sell our seeds worldwide in large quantities for commercial cultivation. We pay attention to the health and resistance of each mother plant that we have selected as a seed carrier for our rare varieties.
Tracing and eradication are not the only scientific approach, nor is there a consensus in the field of plant health. However, they form the sole basis of legislation. In addition, modern breeding focusses on individual resistance genes. However, these resistances are broken too often or too quickly to represent a sound strategy for maintaining plant health. See the photo above for example! It has also been scientifically proven that vital plants can also be carriers of harmful organisms without becoming ill. It would be wrong to destroy healthy plants just because they carry harmful organisms. It is precisely the polygenic properties underlying plant health in these cases that are important for climate-resilient cultivation systems.
On the one hand, the EU Commission (out of concern for plant health) burdens even the smallest professional producers of diversity seeds with maximum bureaucratic effort, but on the other hand it deliberately wants to dispense with the precautionary principle when deregulating genetically manipulated plants. This is so contradictory that it gives rise to the suspicion that the EU is deliberately pursuing the policy of large corporations when it comes to genetic engineering - against the will of EU citizens, who have rejected the use of genetically modified plants in agriculture in all surveys for decades and buy GMO-free products. Unlike the USA, the EU even wants to dispense with liability rules. The promised genetically modified plants adapted to climate change still do not exist. They are uniform, while the diversity varieties with their broad genetic make-up can adapt better year after year.
The conditions for diversity varieties have improved somewhat in the EU in recent years, without any reform. Now the seed law reform wants to undo some of this. The seed law also wants to introduce registration, including for individuals and micro-enterprises professionally involved in diversity conservation.
It also wants to make sustainability a condition for authorisation - you can guess where this is heading: Anything and everything could be labelled as sustainable, especially New Genetic Engineering products. No kidding: all existing and promised traits connected to New Genetic Engineering are mentioned in the law proposal as examples for sustainability.
What you can do:
Petition against the deregulation of new genetic engineering www.weact.campact.de/petitions/kennzeichnung-und-regulierung-aller-gentechnik-pflanzen-erhalten (in German)
Petition on seed law: Raise our forks for diversity! https://mitmachen.arche-noah.at/en/raise-our-forks (in English)
Join the "We're fed up" demonstration on 20.1.24 Berlin www.wir-haben-es-satt.de -
Petition wurde nicht eingereicht
on 27 Sep 2023Liebe Unterstützende,
der Petent oder die Petentin hat innerhalb der letzten 12 Monate nach Ende der Unterschriftensammlung keine Neuigkeiten erstellt und den Status nicht geändert. openPetition geht davon aus, dass die Petition nicht eingereicht oder übergeben wurde.
Wir bedanken uns herzlich für Ihr Engagement und die Unterstützung,
Ihr openPetition-Team -
Changes to the petition
on 29 Jun 2022
Debate
No CONTRA argument yet.