On passengers being excluded from return flights if they have not taken the outbound flight 

The petitioner considers this a violation of his consumer rights, as not taking the outbound flight had the immediate consequence of exclusion from the return flight. He explains that for a business trip from Copenhagen to Munich he had to make a new booking for an earlier outbound flight. This, he feels, is not a legitimate reason to be refused permission to board the already booked return flight, however. The petitioner believes he has the right to use the return flight he already paid for and that the action of the airline constitutes both unlawful expropriation and breach of contract.