ICMPC/ESCOM 2027 must be inclusive and sustainable

Petiția este adresată către
Committee members of ESCOM and ICMPC

111 Semnături

Colecția a fost finalizată

111 Semnături

Colecția a fost finalizată

  1. Început iunie 2025
  2. Colecția a fost finalizată
  3. Trimitere pe 28.08.2025
  4. Dialog cu destinatarul
  5. Decizie

Petiția este adresată către: Committee members of ESCOM and ICMPC

The biggest 2027 conference in music perception and cognition will be a combination of the triennial ESCOM conference and the biennial ICMPC. It will attract hundreds of colleagues from all over the world.

The ESCOM committee recently considered the option of a single-location conference with additional remote presentations. We reject this proposal. While remote presentations are a helpful step, they do not address the core structural issue.

It is no longer OK to invite or encourage hundreds of colleagues to fly across the world to a conference, each emitting in a few days the amount that an average human emits in a year. Nor is it ok to exclude colleagues from the Global South or students who cannot afford roughly 2000 Euros for registration, flight, and accommodation. Young researchers should not be expected to rely on high-carbon travel to advance their careers. Colleagues from the Global South should not be treated as second-class participants.

To our knowledge, the two most promising solutions are fully virtual and multi-hub conferences (cf. internal ESCOM and ICMPC guidelines). We call on the ESCOM and ICMPC committees to implement one of these options.

Abbreviations:
ESCOM = European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music
ICMPC = International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition

motive

The negative effects of global warming (e.g., droughts, floods, fires, heat waves, extreme weather) are gradually worsening, exacerbating disease, hunger, migration, and conflict. At the same time, the gap between rich and poor is widening; the Global South is suffering more than the North. The most affected regions are gradually becoming uninhabitable. Political and corporate responses are inadequate.

Academics in all disciplines have a special responsibility, given our ability to evaluate academic work across disciplines. Apart from contributing academic content, we must urgently reduce our own emissions. Aviation represents more than half of the global warming impact of a typical university, if the radiative forcing index for aviation (roughly 2.7) is considered and all business and private flights of staff and students are included. Single-location conferences may contradict the climate policies or equity goals of our academic societies, universities, or countries.
 
Our principled position on this issue goes beyond the next conference, drawing academic attention to issues of human responsibility and survival.

When signing, please:

  1. include your affiliation under address,
  2. briefly explain why you are signing (qualitative data!), and
  3. at the end, check your name appears under “signers”.

We need signatures that are verifiably from the music perception and cognition community, so ensure your signature is public. Note that changes to your entries are possible even after signing.

Vă mulțumim pentru sprijin, Richard Parncutt, Graz
Întrebare către inițiator

Petiție de distribuire

Imagine cu cod QR

bilețel detașabil cu cod QR

descărcare (PDF)

Informații privind petiția

Petiția a fost inițiată: 02.06.2025
Colecția se termină: 01.12.2025
Regiune: Uniunea Europeană
categorie: Mediu inconjurator

Această petiție a fost tradusă în următoarele limbi

știri

  • Dear signatories,

    Thanks again for supporting the petition “ICMPC/ESCOM 2027 must be inclusive and sustainable". I finally received a response to our petition from the ESCOM and ICMPC committees.

    It’s an impressive example of denial, of both privilege and emissions. One gets the impression that research on music perception and cognition (or even just conference tourism) is more important than the future of humanity.

    For climate activists, the style of writing is familiar. In the research literature on climate denial, this kind of discourse is called virtue signalling, tokenism, green sheen, sustainability rhetoric, performative environmentalism, or simply empty promises.

    I noticed two specific problems:

    1. The text repeatedly expresses concern without plausibly promising corresponding action. For example, there is no commitment to emissions transparency through independently controlled carbon accounting. That would reveal yet another high-carbon conference, like the last two ICMPCs.

    2. The text focuses on small issues, ignoring big ones as if they don’t exist. The authors are pretending not to see the “elephant in the room” – the one we described in the petition text.

    Meanwhile, 15 colleagues have offered to organize hubs or help find hub organizers in their regions. We only need about 7 hubs. Several multi-hub conferences have been held successfully, and there are good peer-reviewed papers on the organizational detail.

    One gets the impression that the real reason for clinging to a 20th-century conference tradition is not being stated.

    Please let me know your thoughts. It helps me a lot to get your feedback and personal viewpoints.

    Yours
    Richard
  • Dear colleagues,

    Thanks again for signing the petition “ICMPC/ESCOM 2027 must be inclusive and sustainable”. The list of signatories was submitted on 27.8.25. Two months later, no answer has arrived. If and when it arrives, I'll forward it straight away.

    A week ago, on 20.10.25, the president of ESCOM wrote that a response letter had been prepared and asked me how it could be sent directly to the signatories. I replied that a pdf could be sent to me and I would forward it to the signatories as an attachment.

    Instead of that, I received an invitation to a General Assembly of ESCOM to be held on 24 November 2025 at 10:30 am UTC/GMT (11:30 in central Europe, 12:30 in Finland). If you are a member of ESCOM, please participate!

    In the agenda is the sentence “ESCOM 2027, together with ICMPC, will be organized by the University of Jyväskylä, in Helsinki and Online.” In other words, the ESCOM executive is going ahead with an exclusive carbon-bomb conference in the midst of a global climate and equity crisis, contradicting the wishes of probably over half of its members and of academic colleagues in music perception and cognition worldwide.

    In fact, a virtual conference is always possible and the multi-hub option is not difficult. We have done it before, the technology is gradually getting easier and faster (and is in any case the same for a single-location conference with remote presentations), there are peer-reviewed academic publications about the details, and I have a preliminary list of 15 colleagues who would help organize hubs in 2027 or find hub organizers on all inhabited continents (far more than we need).

    If your career is affected by this decision, could you send me a few lines about it? Or let me know about other consequences for you or other academic colleagues? Perhaps you have junior colleagues who are affected but fear career consequences if they speak out? Less than 100 words please. Your statement should be anonymous. If I receive ten or more replies, I will forward them, anonymously.

    This conflict has far-reaching implications for conferences in all academic disciplines. So please also let me know if you hear about related discussions in other disciplines. To my knowledge the APA is still deep in denial, but that could change at any time, and the same applies to musicology.

    I’m grateful for feedback of any kind, so don’t hesitate to let me know what you’re thinking.

    Yours
    Richard
    parncutt at uni-graz.at
  • Dear supporters,

    Today I wrote to the chair of ESCOM, and to the ESCOM and ICMPC committees, with a request for a response to our petition. See attached pdf. Thanks again for your support.

    Yours
    Richard

Încă niciun argument PRO.

I believe this is the wrong approach to making a significant contribution to reducing CO2 emissions: (a) Reducing CO2 emissions can be achieved more effectively through changes in our leisure behavior. (b) Virtual encounters do not contribute to identify with the work of scientific societies like ESCOM or ICMPC (c) How many potential participants from African countries are active in music cognition research and are unable to attend due to high costs? Can travelling grants be offered?

Această petiție a fost tradusă în următoarele limbi

Ajută la consolidarea participării civice. Vrem să vă facem auzite preocupările, rămânând în același timp independenți.

Promovează acum