Andragendet er rettet til: comumity

Cambodian casino operator Nagakov said on Friday it expected "no negative impact" on business operations after some disgruntled workers went on strike at the Nagaworld casino complex (pictured) in Phnom Penh. 슬롯사이트

On Thursday, many workers at Nagaworld were reported to have withdrawn their work that day, citing complaints including demands for higher wages.

Nagakov said in a Friday filing that "about 500 to 700 employees" of the complex's "8,200" workforce had participated in "illegal gatherings" outside the company's building on Thursday, but added that "all business operations in the group remained normal." A Reuters report on Thursday said thousands of workers had taken part in the strike.

Nagakov said unionists had called on the company to adjust the monthly minimum wage to $300 for hotel employees and $500 for casino employees. But it said the current wage level is already among the highest, if not the best, levels in Cambodia.

The casino operator said it had tried to mediate in November but that the dispute had dragged on.

Nagakov noted on Wednesday that he had received a provisional injunction from the Phnom Penh city court that ruled Thursday's strike demand would be considered "illegal" and that anyone involved in it would "commit serious crimes."

The casino group also noted that the Phnom Penh first trial court had issued a ruling "investigating the strike against employees involved in illegal strikes for violating court provisional disposition and taking necessary legal action."

In a presentation to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on Friday, Nagakov also said the company had no basis to "terminate" the "foreign" casino operations manager at the Nagaworld casino complex because it had received demands from union members.

"The head of casino operations did not violate the group's rules and regulations, so there is no reason and no reason for the group to dismiss." The head was not named.

The company added that the manager was "responsible for the group and I am not responsible for the World Union." The company added that the labor organization acted outside "legal limits."