The contra argument is based on a number of false assumptions: - That lockdown measures save lives (they demonstrably do not in all research done) - That lockdown does not cause a loss of life (it demonstrably does ) - The measures where based on a false premise and thoroughly debunked computer modelling presenting the virus as a deadly threat when its IFR is roughly equivalent to a moderate flu season (confirmed by Oxford University) As such lifting lockdown will not only save a significant amount of lives but also help reduce some of the enormous collateral damage it has caused.

šaltinis:

Dangerous

This would result in the loss of tens of thousands of lives unnecessarily, and it only serves to benefit the self centered, petty social and fiscal desires of a tiny minority of the populaton, who are the only ones calling for it.

šaltinis: Common sense, decency and the advice of credible health experts.