Koleksiyon tamamlandı
Bu bir çevrimiçi dilekçedir Avrupa Parlamentosu .
The petitioner considers this a violation of his consumer rights, as not taking the outbound flight had the immediate consequence of exclusion from the return flight. He explains that for a business trip from Copenhagen to Munich he had to make a new booking for an earlier outbound flight. This, he feels, is not a legitimate reason to be refused permission to board the already booked return flight, however. The petitioner believes he has the right to use the return flight he already paid for and that the action of the airline constitutes both unlawful expropriation and breach of contract.
Dilekçeye bağlantı
QR kodlu yırtma fişi
indir (PDF)Bu kampanya aşağıdaki dillere çevrilmiştir:
- Deutsche Petition
- Български петиция
- Petición en español
- Česká petice
- Dansk andragende
- Eesti Petitsioon
- Ελληνική Αναφορά
- Pétition en français
- Hrvatska peticiju
- Petizione italiana
- Petīcija latviešu
- Peticija lietuvių
- Magyar petíciót
- Petizzjoni Malti
- Nederlandse petitie
- Polska petycja
- petição português
- petiție română
- Slovenská petícia
- Slovenščina peticija
- Suomen Vetoomus
- Svensk petition
tartışma
Henüz KARŞI argüman yok.
Bu kampanya aşağıdaki dillere çevrilmiştir:
- Deutsche Petition
- Български петиция
- Petición en español
- Česká petice
- Dansk andragende
- Eesti Petitsioon
- Ελληνική Αναφορά
- Pétition en français
- Hrvatska peticiju
- Petizione italiana
- Petīcija latviešu
- Peticija lietuvių
- Magyar petíciót
- Petizzjoni Malti
- Nederlandse petitie
- Polska petycja
- petição português
- petiție română
- Slovenská petícia
- Slovenščina peticija
- Suomen Vetoomus
- Svensk petition